Source: Blair Enns on The Agency Collective
Source: Blair Enns on The Agency Collective

Source: My Interview with Blair Enns
Source: My Interview with Blair Enns
Source: Blair Enns on Design Domination Podcast
Source: Blair Enns on The Agency Collective

Source: Blair Enns on The Futur

Source: Blair Enns with Anneli Hansson
Source: My Interview with Blair Enns
Source: My Interview with Blair Enns
Source: My Interview with Blair Enns
Source: My Interview with Blair Enns
Source: My Interview with Blair Enns
Source: Blair Enns on Ditching Hourly
Source: My Interview with Blair Enns
Source: My Interview with Blair Enns
Source: My Interview with Blair Enns

This aligns with something Ryan Deiss told me around the Netflix model in B2B – It doesn’t work.
Customers in our space don't actually want an archive of your material. We're drowning in content, and when you present customers with a library, of which they'll consume a fraction, at some point, they develop the perception that they're paying for material that they're not using.
By throwing everything in, you devalue the material they actually came for:
Source: Blair Enns on 2Bobs

This pattern comes up regularly in my research of other Undisputed Authorities. They publish a blog post or series of tweets, the material strikes a nerve with the market, the author subsequently recognises that they’re onto something, then they expand on that shorter form content into a coherent, structured body of work (a book).
For example, take Austin Kleon and Steal Like An Artist, which has sold more than 2 million copies:
Source: Austin Kleon on The Futur
Source: Blair Enns on 2Bobs
Source: Blair Enns on 2Bobs


Source: My Interview with Blair Enns
Source: My Interview with Blair Enns
Source: Blair Enns on Consulting Success Podcast
Source: Blair Enns on The Agency Collective
Source: Blair Enns on The Agency Collective

Blair has since slightly changed his perspective on a couple of points above.
Firstly, he's introduced the distinction of standardised delivery and standardised pricing.
According to Blair, “The most lucrative business models for professional firms appears to be a combination of standardized delivery (productized services) and customized pricing (price the client).”
So, the firm or consultant develops a process (or processes) for consistently delivering results, but they don’t stick a price label on the service. They price each client according to the value delivered.
Secondly, the ceiling of potential for a consulting business model is significantly higher than the $350,000 he believed it was back in 2013:
Source: My Interview with Blair Enns
Source: Blair Enns on Modern Sales - B2B Selling Podcast


This is a good point to highlight the three different ways to produce thought leadership content, of which Blair uses two.
All require insight derived from data.
The first type is data derived from personal experience. For Blair, that was The Win Without Pitching Manifesto. Blair had spent eight years working with creative firms, helping them win business without submitting to the formalities of a pitch. He did no research for that book. The insights were derived from his personal experiences and expertise on the subject – the patterns he’d noticed in the field.
The second type of data is primary. As far as I’m aware, Blair hasn’t created any significant thought leadership using primary research, so we’ll use David C. Baker as an example. David’s firm, Punctuation, works with agency owners sell their firms and buyers buy them. He’s worked with over 200 firms at this point, and in doing so, has built a repository of unique, proprietary data on the intricacies of buying and selling a firm – hard numbers, which inform unique thought leadership.
The third type of data is secondary, which is what Pricing Creativity is built on. Blair conducts heavy research on pricing using secondary data (books), then translates that data and applies it to a new field – creative firms.
Source: Blair Enns with Anneli Hansson
Notice that none of the research for any thought leadership content involves heavy consumption of material from within his own field. There’s value in knowing what your peers are doing, but if you look too closely, you end up regurgitating ideas that have already been presented to your target customer (which leads to vanilla content that gets ignored).
So, if you’re going to do research, either collect proprietary data or translate ideas and stories from other fields.
Source: My Interview with Blair Enns
Source: Blair Enns, How to Cheat Content Marketing


Deconstructing one particular piece of content or format to look for signs of success is a dangerous game, but there are a few areas we can safely analyse and draw conclusions from.
Both David and Blair have said that the key to producing a podcast as a duo was that they both know each other really well. They’re good friends, and there was chemistry from day one.
Another thing to note is that they prioritise writing, first and foremost, which is essential to developing their thinking that they share on the podcast. Every second or third blog post gets turned into a podcast. The audio material isn’t off the cuff and they curate only the best writing for the podcast.
He makes a lot, publishes a little.
Blair writes a daily email to his private list – The Win Without Pitching Academy. Once you go through their training, you get access to the Academy and mobile app.
He delivers short, 200-300 word posts. That’s the making a lot aspect.
He’s curating the best ideas, turning them into public blog posts or LinkedIn posts.
It’s like the comedian sharing his material amongst his peers. The material that gets the right response from peers passes through to a small audience, subsequently filtering again for the stuff that resonates. Then, those pieces are constructed together to form a Comedy Special.
I don’t know if the podcast is the equivalent of the Special. The book is probably the equivalent, but there’s a ladder of curation, and the podcast is towards the top.
My guess is that’s why the material resonates so deeply. It’s gone through a thorough filtering process.
Then the very best of those get turned into a podcast.
This pattern is consistent amongst elite artists in every field.
They make a lot, publish a little (as James Clear calls it).
Source: Blair Enns on 2Bobs

Source: My Interview with Blair Enns

I don’t see potential cannibalisation where Blair does.
It's unlikely that someone who buys the $30 book and then DIY was ever going to by your $4,000 training programme.
What’s more likely is a bunch of DIY folk will evangelise your approach (if it resonates), buy the book, share the book, and engage with your content online, as happened with April Dunford. That builds the authorities’ standing in the space, which gives them the opportunity to speak on bigger stages and podcasts.
The people who are likely to buy the $4,000+ training programme attend those events and listen to those podcasts. They subsequently read the book, and then have the inclination and budget to pay for the training (because they want Blair and his team to help them practice and implement the framework).
Source: My Interview with Blair Enns

Note: With Blair Enns' permission, quotes have been edited to remove verbal fillers and improve readability while preserving meaning and voice.
Get the free Disruptive Wisdom series
I've studied dozens of top consultants like David C. Baker and Dorie Clark and identified the patterns behind their success.
Get my free 10-part email series breaking down how they transitioned from invisible experts to Undisputed Authorities.